An argument in favor of federal funding for stem cell research essay

Arguments in Support of Embryonic Stem Cell Funding

Federal funds would not pay for the creation of embryos for the purpose of establishing stem cell lines. The only way to avoid such morally unacceptable actions is to insure that the government has the legal right to impose guidelines and bylaws regarding such types of research that may, in the future, be based upon the results of current stem cell experimentation and research.

The ability to regenerate poorly functioning or damaged tissue might provide definitive therapy for many of the above diseases. If that assumption were correct, would it then be unethical not to have embryo farms in order to save the further differentiated human beings who we value more?

Some medical researchers use cells that have not yet differentiated into specific kinds of tissue, and therefore might be induced to become the kind of tissue needed to treat a specific disease. These pluripotent stem cells are abundantly present during embryonic development when most cells are just beginning to differentiate, or specializeand become less abundant as the organism matures into adulthood.

Studies using human embryonic stem cells as a treatment do not yet exist. First of all, spare embryos are destined to die because they have been created by means of IVF to provide backup in case pregnancy is not successful.

Typically, the spare embryos remaining after a successful implantation has been achieved are discarded. Like Jesus, Mohammad also broke from standard religious thought of the time by suggesting that individuals were responsible for their own behavior, and that Allah cared for each one of us.

The reader will notice that religious arguments are not a part of this list. Studies under the Upas Tree. Cloning may become morally acceptableand this would also potentially diminish protections currently afforded to human embryos, insofar as the moral logic that protests against cloning is analogous to the moral logic that affords protections to embryos.

If the argument in favor of stem cell research and cloning was to ever become ideological, then it would clearly lose this advantage that it enjoys within modern society. Catholics, along with Americans of many other religious backgrounds or none, believe that each individual has rights and duties, including a duty to respect the existence of other individuals.

Reducing the number of foreign genes inserted from four to one requires the addition of other factors such as proteins, RNA, or small molecules. Our material a co-polymer artificially synthesized to resemble connective tissue structures found during embryonic development apparently induces de-differentiation followed by explosive differentiation to regenerate completely integrated tissue.

For example, Saey has discussed research indicating the potential of the practice of cloning to produce stem cells from adult skin. The potential for abuse and morally unacceptable experimentation procedures is left open wide just because the government chose to steer clear of an issue that divides all aspects of the state and church.

Some researchers believe that stem cells found in the embryo provide more potential for regenerating tissue than do stem cells taken from older, adult donors.

The right of scientists to pursue stem cell research and cloning Finally, a third element of the argument in favor of stem cell research and cloning pertains to what could be called the prerogative of science. But what if, because the government refuses to get involved in the experimentation process through funding and because of this, the private companies that fund such research think that they are therefore above the law?

The alleviation of suffering The significance of the regulatory context The prerogative of science itself to pursue knowledge Finally, the essay will reflect on the implications of this argument for the present-day situation regarding the selected issue.J. Leslie Glick, Ph.D.

InPresident Obama removed restrictions on federal funding of research on new stem cell lines derived from spare human embryos created by. The Case Against Funding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Essay Sample. On August 23,the National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued final guidelines for federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research.

The Importance of Stem Cell Research Essay. Stem cell research is a topic almost everybody in the world has a viewpoint on. Many view the issue of stem cell research and stem cell therapy as morally wrong and a crime against humanity, others view the study of stem cells as the next step in modern science.

The policy announced by President Bush on August 9,did not ban federal funding of embryonic stem cell research; rather, for the first time, it provided and endorsed such funding (as long as the stem cell lines had been derived prior to that date).The aim of this policy was not to shackle scientific research but to find a way to reconcile the need for.

Background on the argument in favor of stem cell research and cloning. The essay will not argue in favor of the argument itself but will simply delineate the argument and evaluate the logical coherence of the different elements of the argument.5/5(2).

Although Dr.

An Argument in Favor Of Federal Funding For Stem Cell Research Essay Sample

Lewis-Usala makes some valid points in his argument again stem cell research, the fact is that the benefits of the end result of human stem cell research far outweigh the negatives. The issue at hand is helping the human body to heal itself.

An argument in favor of federal funding for stem cell research essay
Rated 5/5 based on 51 review