An analysis of the al gore and george bush on the presidential elections in 2000

Its controversial results will affect the nation for many years of the new era. United States presidential election ofAmerican presidential election held on Nov. Cleavages on issues of race, morality, and lifestyle developed alongside the previous divisions on economic and welfare policy.

But times of plenty, like times of crisis, are tests of American character Carmines and Geoffrey C. The institutions of American democracy were eventually vindicated, but the threats themselves are very worrisome. A slightly greater proportion found that he shared their general view of government 51 percent compared to 47 percent.

The approach was typified by his convention acceptance speech: Prior to the election, 94, voters were removed Kelly, With the ending of the cold war, foreign policy became less of an immediate concern for the nation.

If there were no important differences, then Democratic voters had little reason to support a candidate whose personal traits were less than magnetic. Both parties paid special attention to Latinos, knowing that they would soon be the largest nonwhite group in the population and that they already comprised a significant voting bloc in critical states such as California, Texas, and Florida.

Preventing the recount from being completed will inevitably cast a cloud on the legitimacy of the election. Only in these close states, particularly Florida, did votes for the minor candidacies of Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan make a difference--but there they were still an immense influence.

Al Gore concedes presidential election

According to 28 U. Gary Bauer dropped out. He said he got more media coverage after the election than he did during the campaign id. Gore more likely, not less likely, either in Florida or elsewhere.

United States presidential election, 2000

Counting every legally cast vote cannot constitute irreparable harm David Boies represented Gore This was the most closely decided issue in the case.

Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not a recipe for producing election results that have the public acceptance democratic stability requires. March Part of the reason recounts could not be completed was the various stoppages ordered by the various branches and levels of the judiciary, most notably the Supreme Court itself.

Of particular relevance [17] to this case was the so-called " safe harbor " provision, which allows states to appoint their electors without Congressional interference if done by a specified deadline: With no apparent need for government intervention to maintain employment and growth, the economic leadership of the president has become less critical.

In carrying the preponderance of states 30Bush changed the landscape of American politics. Even when Democrats won--in and in the two Clinton candidacies-their victories were unconvincing. The congressional revolution ofwhich ended four decades of Democratic control, was maintained into a fourth Republican term.

Rapid developments[ edit ] Supporters for the Gore-Lieberman ticket outside the U. Gore arose under the contest provisions. On February 28, McCain also referred to Rev. Had Cheney not done this, either he or Bush would have forfeited their electoral votes from the Texas electors.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida on December 8,overturned these rejections and ordered that all federal write-in ballots previously rejected be counted. Ultimately, the Senate called for a revote, and Durkin won by 2 votes.

Both could read the returns as encouraging portents for the future. This ruling was by a 7—2 vote. A national recount would mean that the extended delays already experienced in the one state would be replicated everywhere, making it unlikely that America would have a president clearly accepted in time for the inauguration.

Hide Caption 12 of 15 Photos: Some of these counties sent their ballots to the county seat election headquarters for tabulation, while others tallied votes at the polling place. Calculated, to three decimal places, from the vote totals in the Appendix table. In elaborate analyses just as the campaign formally began on Labor Day, academic experts unanimously predicted a Gore victory.

The election was contested for eight months. Pat Buchanan dropped out to run for the Reform Party nomination. On election night, no clear winner emerged. Rick Santorum won by 34 votes, but results from several precincts were missing and the full actual results may never be known.The presidential election of hinged on the outcome in Florida.

First, the television networks said that Vice President Al Gore had carried the state. Then, the state’s election was considered “too close to call.” Then, the networks declared Texas Governor George W. Bush the winner. The.

So, who really won? What the Bush v. Gore studies showed

Presidential General Election Results Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse. Presidential. Essential details and fun facts about the presidential election ofwhen George Bush narrowly defeated Al Gore—but only by electoral votes.

In Bush v. Gore (), a divided Supreme Court ruled that the state of Florida's court-ordered manual recount of vote ballots in the presidential election was unconstitutional. The case. Oct 31,  · After the grueling day Florida recount battle, Al Gore conceded the presidency to George W.

Bush on December 13, Bush v. Gore, U.S. 98 (), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's presidential ruling was issued on December 12, On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring.

Eight days earlier, the Court unanimously decided the closely related case of Bush v.

An analysis of the al gore and george bush on the presidential elections in 2000
Rated 0/5 based on 66 review